doi: 10.1007/s1057-2ĭriemeier C, Calligaris GA (2010) Theoretical and experimental developments for accurate determination of crystallinity of cellulose I materials. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.04.042ĭriemeier C (2014) Two-dimensional rietveld analysis of celluloses from higher plants. doi: 10.1021/jf051851zĭixon P, Ahvenainen P, Aijazi A, Chen S, Lin S, Augusciak P, Borrega M, Svedström K, Gibson L (2015) Comparison of the structure and flexural properties of Moso, Guadua and Tre Gai bamboo. doi: 10.1063/1.1698419ĭing SY, Himmel ME (2006) The maize primary cell wall microfibril: a new model derived from direct visualization. doi: 10.1002/jps.23909ĭebye P, Bueche AM (1949) Scattering by an inhomogeneous solid. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6215(02)00038-1ĭe Figueiredo LP, Ferreira FF (2014) The rietveld method as a tool to quantify the amorphous amount of microcrystalline cellulose. doi: 10.1007/s0070-5ĭavies LM, Harris PJ, Newman RH (2002) Molecular ordering of cellulose after extraction of polysaccharides from primary cell walls of Arabidopsis thaliana: a solid-state CP/MAS (13)C NMR study. Monatshefte für Chem Chem Mon 145:175–185. doi: 10.1007/s0022-5Ĭhen C, Luo J, Qin W, Tong Z (2013) Elemental analysis, chemical composition, cellulose crystallinity, and FT-IR spectra of Toona sinensis wood. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.04.014īorrega M, Ahvenainen P, Serimaa R, Gibson L (2015) Composition and structure of balsa (Ochroma pyramidale) wood. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.068īarnette AL, Lee C, Bradley LC, Schreiner EP, Park YB, Shin H, Cosgrove DJ, Park S, Kim SH (2012) Quantification of crystalline cellulose in lignocellulosic biomass using sum frequency generation (SFG) vibration spectroscopy and comparison with other analytical methods. doi: 10.1007/s1008-xīansal P, Hall M, Realff MJ, Lee JH, Bommarius AS (2010) Multivariate statistical analysis of X-ray data from cellulose: a new method to determine degree of crystallinity and predict hydrolysis rates. doi: 10.1021/jf304465kĪndersson S, Serimaa R, Paakkari T, Saranpää P, Pesonen E (2003) Crystallinity of wood and the size of cellulose crystallites in Norway spruce (Picea abies). All analysis methods have weaknesses that should be considered when assessing differences in sample crystallinity.Īgarwal UP, Reiner RR, Ralph SA (2013) Estimation of cellulose crystallinity of lignocelluloses using near-IR FT-Raman spectroscopy and comparison of the Raman and Segal-WAXS methods. On the other hand, these values are too low according to the Rietveld refinement. The least-squares fitting using an amorphous standard shows the smallest crystallite size dependence and this method combined with perpendicular transmission geometry also yielded values closest to independently obtained cellulose crystallinity values. For small crystallinity differences, however, correlation was not seen for samples that were from distinct sample sets. A good linear correlation ( \(r^ \ge 0.90\)) between the five most common methods suggests that they agree on large-scale crystallinity differences between samples. In particular, samples ( \(n=6\)) with low crystallinity and small crystallite sizes are included. A larger ( \(n=16\)) and more varied collection of samples than previous studies have presented is used. In this work, the five most common analysis methods (the Segal peak height method and those based on peak fitting and/or amorphous standards) are critically reviewed and compared to two-dimensional Rietveld refinement. X-ray diffraction is often used for this purpose for its perceived robustness and availability. Cellulose crystallinity assessment is important for optimizing the yield of cellulose products, such as bioethanol.
0 kommentar(er)
